“Are students improving?”
Before and after metrics per student, cohort, and competency. +18% average communication-readiness gain across pilots. The progression data your dean, HoD, or board has been asking for.
Every student gets private daily practice on real life scenarios, plus instant feedback. Teachers and career officers see who's ready.
Trusted by 5+ institutions and 10,000+ learners.
THE PROGRESSION PROBLEM
Most students don't practise speaking, because presenting in class or booking a mock interview means calendar friction and public embarrassment. And teachers and career officers can't reach everyone at scale, or mark every recording, so they walk into review with attendance lists instead of progression data.
Are students improving across the term, and by how much?
Who's ready to interview or present, and who needs more support?
Will this hold up in the end-of-term review or audit?
DECISIONS, NOT DASHBOARDS
Before and after metrics per student, cohort, and competency. Recommended actions baked in, so the answer to who needs help before exams and placement is one click away, not a 30-student email thread or three weekends of marking.
READY TO PROGRESS
68%
▲ 12 pts vs Wk 1
SESSIONS LOGGED
8,420
▲ across schools & faculties
AVG CLARITY
+18%
▲ baseline → Wk 12
FILLER WORDS
−42%
▼ across all cohorts
| Cohort | Students | Performance Δ | Engagement | Recommended next step |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year 12 / final year | 342 | +22% | 82% | Refer 24 to mock interview week |
| Undergraduate: Business | 418 | +19% | 71% | Add to top-pick employer pool |
| Undergraduate: Health Sciences | 196 | +11% | 58% | Schedule 1:1s before placement |
| Senior English classes | 284 | +15% | 74% | Run moderation session |
| Postgraduate coursework | 108 | +24% | 89% | Promote to peer mentors |
Jordan M.
Year 12 / final year · exam & interview prep
Ananya K.
Undergraduate: Business · consulting track
Ravi T.
Undergraduate: Health Sciences · placement window open
Siobhan O.
Postgraduate coursework · peer mentor candidate
HOW IT STACKS UP
Most “employability” and oral-communication programs arrive without a per-student progression metric. Elqo is the one option that gives teachers and career officers cohort-level data, recommended actions, and a review-ready report at term-end, without adding to the marking or booking pile.
WHY ELQO
Before and after metrics per student, cohort, and competency. +18% average communication-readiness gain across pilots. The progression data your dean, HoD, or board has been asking for.
Every student gets a ready / coach / refer to workshop or mock interview recommendation. Every cohort gets a next step. Support reaches the students who actually need it, not just the ones who book first.
Exportable end-of-term and end-of-semester reports tied to baseline and delta per cohort. Drops into a faculty review, accreditation pack, audit, or budget ask without rework.
Students don't present or book mock interviews because they don't want to feel embarrassed in front of a class or a stranger. Elqo sessions are private, judgment-free, and take under 10 minutes, so practice can happen at 11pm the night before a big oral exam or interview, not on a calendar three weeks from now.
SECURITY & STUDENT-DATA HANDLING
Auth, FERPA-aligned and GDPR-compliant data handling, under-18 privacy controls, and admin controls designed alongside the IT, registrar, and child-safety teams of our pilot institutions. Recordings and transcripts are encrypted in transit and at rest, and are never used for model training.
An exportable end-of-term report: baseline performance per student and cohort, delta after the program, weekly active rate, and per-student recommendations (ready to progress, refer to workshop or mock interview, schedule a 1:1 or re-attempt). Designed to drop into a faculty review, accreditation pack, or audit without rework.
Every student is scored against your rubric (clarity, structure, delivery, persuasion, and more) on a baseline session and re-scored on every subsequent session. The dashboard surfaces the delta, not just activity. Engagement is the leading indicator; performance change is the metric faculty and leadership actually want to see.
No. Elqo supplements them. Students get the practice reps and standardised feedback Elqo handles, then teachers and career officers spot-check, moderate, and confirm grades or readiness for assessment-of-record. Total marking and booking time goes down, not up.
Custom rubrics and scenarios are built against your framework, whether that is NESA, ACARA, or IB outcomes for schools, or graduate attributes and industry-specific interview criteria for universities and career centres. Performance data ties directly to the outcomes you already report on at term-end and at audit.
Yes. Elqo is FERPA-aligned and GDPR-compliant, with configurable data residency (US/EU/AU), SSO (SAML, Shibboleth, Google Workspace, Microsoft 365), SCIM provisioning, role-based access, and full audit logs. For under-18s it adds COPPA-aware handling, a parental consent workflow, and optional parent visibility. Recordings and transcripts are encrypted in transit and at rest, and are never used for model training.
Yes. We integrate with Canvas, Blackboard, and Moodle via SCORM/xAPI, and export per-student data via API and CSV for systems like Symplicity, 12twenty, and CareerHub. Elqo is browser-based and runs on Chromebooks, iPads, Windows, Mac, and any modern student device.
Per-seat, annual contracts, with significant pricing scale at higher volumes. Most institutions start with a single class, year level, or faculty cohort as a pilot. Most pilots go live in under 14 days, with first dashboard data inside 4 weeks. Full rollouts with SSO and custom scenarios typically launch within 4 to 6 weeks. Book a demo for a tailored quote.