“Are students hitting outcomes?”
Per-student progression mapped to NESA, ACARA, IB, or your school's scope-and-sequence. Outcome-by-outcome, week-by-week. The data your registration body is going to ask for anyway.
FOR HIGH SCHOOLS
Elqo is assessment infrastructure for oral communication. Students complete structured practice mapped to your syllabus, teachers see exactly where each student is — without sitting through every presentation, and without creating more marking.
+22%
avg performance gain over a term [placeholder]
~6h
marking saved per teacher, per week
92%
of students complete weekly practice
<7d
to first dashboard, with class data
THE ORAL ASSESSMENT PROBLEM
Most schools settle for one annual presentation per student because anything more creates more marking, more marker variance, and not much more audit-ready evidence. Elqo is the assessment-infrastructure layer underneath: every student gets reps mapped to your syllabus, teachers get a standardised first-pass score they spot-check, and HoDs walk into faculty review with per-student progression data instead of attendance lists.
Are students hitting the curriculum outcomes for this stage?
Who needs intervention before the next assessment?
What can I show at term-end and at audit?
DECISIONS, NOT DASHBOARDS
Baseline-to-current scores per student, per class, per outcome. Recommended actions baked in, so the answer to “who needs intervention before assessment” is one click away — not three weekends of marking.
OUTCOMES MET
87%
▲ 14 pts vs Wk 1
SESSIONS LOGGED
3,640
▲ across 6 classes
AVG STRUCTURE
+22%
▲ baseline → Wk 8
MARKING SAVED
~6h/wk
▼ per teacher
| Class | Students | Outcome Δ | Engagement | Recommended next step |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year 12 ATAR English | 28 | +24% | 92% | Mark 14 for assessment |
| Year 11 English Standard | 32 | +19% | 78% | Run moderation session |
| Year 11 English Advanced | 26 | +23% | 89% | Share clips with parents |
| Year 10 English | 30 | +11% | 64% | Schedule re-attempts (6) |
| Year 9 Public Speaking | 26 | +18% | 83% | Open to wider Year 9 |
Jordan M.
Year 12 ATAR English · Module B
Ananya K.
Year 11 English Advanced · speech task
Ravi T.
Year 10 English · persuasive speaking
Siobhan O.
Year 11 Standard · oral exam prep
HOW IT STACKS UP
Most schools choose between “one big presentation per year” and “more presentations = more marking.” Elqo is the assessment-infrastructure layer that gives every student reps, every teacher consistent first-pass scoring, and every HoD audit-ready evidence at term-end.
WHY ELQO
Per-student progression mapped to NESA, ACARA, IB, or your school's scope-and-sequence. Outcome-by-outcome, week-by-week. The data your registration body is going to ask for anyway.
Every student gets a mark for assessment / schedule re-attempt / refer to support recommendation. Catch the kids drifting before the formal task, not after.
Exportable term reports tied to syllabus outcomes. Drops into a faculty review, board pack, or AISNSW/ACARA audit without rework.
Same rubric, same first-pass scoring, no marker variance. Moderation sessions go from re-marking to spot-checking. Your HoD finally gets defensible cross-class comparison.
Elqo runs first-pass scoring against your rubric. Teachers spot-check and confirm rather than mark every recording end-to-end. Pilot teachers report ~6 hours/week saved.
COPPA-aware, parental consent workflow, optional parent visibility, AU data residency for AU schools, role-based access for HoD vs teacher. Built so your IT and child-safety officers say yes.
SECURITY & UNDER-18 PRIVACY
Privacy-first under-18 data handling, parental consent workflow, and admin controls designed alongside the IT and child-safety teams of our pilot schools. Recordings and transcripts are encrypted in transit and at rest, never used for model training.
An audit-ready term report: every student's baseline performance, delta after the term, mapped to your syllabus outcomes (NESA, ACARA, IB, or your own rubric), with per-student recommendations (mark for assessment, schedule re-attempt, refer to support). Drops into a faculty review or audit pack without rework.
No. Elqo supplements in-class presentations and oral exams — students get the practice reps and standardised feedback Elqo handles, then teachers spot-check, moderate, and confirm grades for assessment-of-record. Total marking time goes down, not up.
Custom rubrics are built against your syllabus outcomes (NESA Stage 5/6 English, ACARA cross-curriculum, IB MYP/DP, or your school's own scope-and-sequence). Performance data ties directly to outcomes you already report on at term-end and at audit.
Yes. Elqo is built privacy-first for under-18s. COPPA-aware data handling, configurable data residency (AU schools default to AU), built-in parental consent workflow, optional parent visibility, role-based access, and full audit logs. Recordings and transcripts are encrypted in transit and at rest, and we never train models on student data.
Pilot teachers report approximately 6 hours per week saved on oral assessment. Elqo runs first-pass scoring against your rubric so teachers spot-check and moderate rather than mark every recording end-to-end. The bigger win is consistency — fewer marker-variance arguments at moderation.
Yes. Elqo is browser-based and runs on Chromebooks, iPads, Windows, Mac, and any modern student device. SSO via Google Workspace for Education, Microsoft 365, and Clever is supported.
Per-student annual pricing, scaled for whole-cohort or whole-school deployments. Most schools start with a single year level or department as a pilot before going school-wide. Book a walkthrough for a tailored quote.
30 minutes with our team. Walk away with a tailored department pilot plan, the syllabus outcomes we'd map for your school, and a one-pager you can share with your HoD or principal.
Book a walkthroughNo hard sell. Built for heads of department who don't have time for another vendor.